Half of Navy’s amphibious fleet in ‘poor condition,’ some ships out for years, GAO warns

Source and Full Article: Breaking Defense

WASHINGTON — Half of the Navy ships the Marine Corps would use to make amphibious assaults are in “poor condition,” and some of the vessels have been unavailable for operational or training use for years at a time, according to a pointed new watchdog report.

“Amphibious warfare ships are critical for Marine Corps missions, but the Navy has struggled to ensure they are available for operations and training,” reads a new report from the Government Accountability Report, published today.

The Navy is required by law to maintain a fleet of at least 31 amphibious vessels; it currently counts 32. But the report found that as of March this year, nine of the Navy’s 10 dock landing ships were in “poor material condition,” as were five of the seven amphibious assault ships and two of the 13 amphibious transport docks. The Navy’s two amphibious assault ships were both in “satisfactory material condition.”

The report notes several factors that contributed to the problem, including “challenges with spare parts.” But a summary of the report also noted that in order to “save money, the Navy proposed early retirement for some ships and cancelled critical maintenance on them. But the Navy is still relying on these ships — which haven’t been well-maintained — while it waits for new ones to be built. As a result, it will be hard to continue meeting the 31-ship requirement.”

Amphib readiness has been a topic of much discussion, as service leaders and lawmakers have scuffled over just how many of the ships the Marine Corps really needs, and how relevant they are to modern combat operations.

By this summer the Navy and Marine Corps leadership had “locked shields” in defense of the fleet, and in July the heads of both organizations announced they had jointly signed off on new guidelines that were meant to “ensure consistency and uniformity in Navy and Marine Corps amphibious force planning, assessment, and operational mission execution.” (The GAO report also pinged the services for disagreeing with each other “on the number of ships that should be available at any given time to conduct operations and training.”)

As for the GAO report, in the end the oversight body makes four recommendations, three of which dealt with still better defining readiness terminology as well as establishing clear timelines and performance goals related to assessing and improving readiness. The Navy concurred with all of those.

The Navy partially concurred with the GAO recommendation that the Navy update its amphibious ship depot maintenance policy “to clarify that, absent operational needs, the Navy should not cancel depot maintenance for amphibious ships proposed for divestment that have yet to reach the end of their expected service life.”

HELP US FUND FREE OPEN SOURCE DATA!

Please donate here to support our effort to share open source intelligence data. Core provides OSINT data collection for free but we do incur time and expenses to locate and capture it. Any donation amount you can provide (one time or recurring) is highly appreciated and it helps us fund this effort of information sharing.